General Business Services, Inc. v. Fletcher

308 F. Supp. 1135, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13271
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina
DecidedNovember 28, 1969
DocketCiv. A. No. 603
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 F. Supp. 1135 (General Business Services, Inc. v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Business Services, Inc. v. Fletcher, 308 F. Supp. 1135, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13271 (E.D.N.C. 1969).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KELLAM, District Judge

(under designation).

By written agreement of January 2, 1967, Silas Fletcher, Sr., the defendant, became an “Area Director” of the plaintiff company in a designated geographical area of North Carolina for the purpose of providing certain accounting and bookkeeping services for subscribers which the Area Director might obtain. It appears that the General Business Services, Inc. [hereafter “GBS”] is engaged in accounting and tax services and for such has prepared a system of maintaining business records. . An Area Director enters into a contract with “GBS” to provide these services in the field and to use the systems developed for this purpose. The contract specifies the financial arrangement under which both “GBS” and the Area Director share in the fees paid by subscribers of the services.

By letter of September 19, 1968, the President of “GBS” informed the defendant that effective October 19, 1968, his association as an Area Director was [1136]*1136terminated pursuant to Section 15 of the contract, [See copy attached as appendix] for violations which included failure of the defendant to attend group training sessions and seminars, preparation of income tax returns for subscribers which is expressly prohibited in the contract, and failure to obtain a listing in the telephone directories used in the area served.

After termination of the contract, the plaintiff instituted this action alleging that the defendant following termination (1)was using the “GBS” system of records, (2) had failed to register new subscribers with the company, (3) was continuing to hold himself out after October 19, 1968, as a representative of “GBS”, (4) was using forms of a similar nature with the designation thereon of “UBS” rather than “GBS”, and (5) was in competition in violation of the non-competition clause of the contract. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction, award of the contract’s liquidated damages sum in the amount of $5,000.00, and punitive damages. A preliminary injunction against the defendant was entered by Judge John D. Larkins, Jr., on March 17, 1969.

At the trial the defendant was represented per se. He was advised at the pretrial conference of the complexity of the issues, of the difficulty of properly presenting evidence, examining witnesses, and of complying with the rules of evidence in a trial, and that, therefore, he might be better enabled to present his defense with counsel. The matter was heard without a jury.

Officials of the plaintiff company testified as to the grounds and incidents which led to the termination of the contract. The evidence established that in October, 1968, a subscriber had in his possession a system furnished him by the defendant but unregistered with “GBS”; that in late October, 1968, the defendant was still keeping his business records under the “GBS” system; and that subscribers to plaintiff, serviced by the defendant, were using forms marked “UBS”.

The defendant, in his argument, based his defense on his allegation that “GBS” itself had breached the contract by not providing income tax return services to subscribers. He furthermore charged that the plaintiff was taking undue advantage of its subscribers by not providing the services due and that “the little people of North Carolina” were the “victims.”

If the subscribers to the services of “GBS” in good faith have a cause of action, the courts of the land are available to them and they would be advised to seek any remedy which may be theirs. This holds true for the defendant as well. However, these issues are not before the court at trial. The sole question is whether the plaintiff has proved the allegations of the complaint and, if so, to what relief and damages it is entitled.

The record is clear that defendant’s contract was terminated for good cause, and following termination, defendant continued to conduct himself as an Area Director of “GBS” and used the “GBS” system with its accompanying forms or those strikingly similar thereto.

As for the defendant’s counterclaim, it is dismissed, no evidence whatsoever having been presented by him to substantiate it.

Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction against the defendant.

Section thirteen of the contract provides for liquidated damages in the event that the non-competition provisions are breached by the Area Director. While such clauses in contracts have not always received the favor of the courts, particularly if in the form of a penalty, it appears that the Supreme Court of North Carolina holds such clauses valid if for the purpose of an award for damages and not solely as a penalty. Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355, 160 S.E.2d 29 (1968). [1137]*1137By virtue of the plaintiff having proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant violated the contract, it is entitled to damages for the actions of the defendant in continuing to use the systems of “GBS”.

The Court sees no necessity of awarding the plaintiff punitive damages.

It is therefore ordered, that:

(1) The defendant, Silas Fletcher, Sr., his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in concert and participation with him, be and are permanently restrained and enjoined from using in connection with accounting, record keeping, or tax counselling business services the name “General Business Services”, or the mark “GBS”, or any colorable imitation thereof, or from unfairly competing with the plaintiff in any manner whatsoever, and that all instruments, if any, in the custody of the Court under the provisions of the preliminary injunction issued on March 17, 1969, be redelivered to the plaintiff.

(2) The defendant, Silas Fletcher, Sr., his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in concert and participation with him, be and are permanently restrained and enjoined from further holding himself or themselves out to the business public as doing business under the name of “General Business Services” or “GBS”, or by any other name, style or mark which is confusingly similar thereto.

(3) This injunction is not to be a restraint or interference with the defendant’s practice as an accountant.

(4) The sum of $5,000.00 is hereby awarded the plaintiff as damages caused by the actions of the defendant.

(5) The plaintiff shall be entitled to $1,000.00 as reasonable attorneys’ fees, together with the cost and expense of maintaining this action as taxed by the Clerk.

(6) Copy of this Order be forwarded to all counsel and to the defendant.

APPENDIX

APPOINTMENT OF AREA DIRECTOR

THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 2nd day of January, 1967, by and between GENERAL BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., a Maryland corporation, with its principal office and place of business at 7401 Wisconsin Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20014 (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and Silas Fletcher, residing at Route # 1, Box 90, Gatesville, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as the “Area Director”);

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Company is in the business of selling annual service subscriptions through franchised distributors who purchase such subscriptions for resale to Subscribers; and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

No. 14340
435 F.2d 863 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)
General Business Services., Inc. v. Fletcher
435 F.2d 863 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 F. Supp. 1135, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-business-services-inc-v-fletcher-nced-1969.