General Auto Service, Inc. v. Lombard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

General Auto Service, Inc. v. Lombard

147 So. 2d 31, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2733

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 3, 1962

DocketNo. 988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 So. 2d 31 (General Auto Service, Inc. v. Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Auto Service, Inc. v. Lombard, 147 So. 2d 31, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2733 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellee moves to dismiss appellant’s devolutive appeal on the ground that on June 14, 1962, plaintiff appealed from a judgment rendered by the First City Court of New Orleans, which judgment it is alleged in the motion of appeal was dated November 25, 1958. However, in appellant’s return to the motion to dismiss, counsel states that the judgment of the lower court was rendered on May 31, 1962, but that, through inadvertence, the date of the judgment is incorrectly set forth as November 25, 1958. Counsel prays that he be allowed to correct the erroneous date.

It would be foolhardy for a party to appeal from a judgment in which it had been awarded a judgment as prayed for. It necessarily follows that there was a clerical error which is perfectly clear to this court since the record containing both judgments is before us. LSA-C.C.P. art. 865 reads as follows:

“Construction of pleadings

Every pleading shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.”

Accordingly, appellant is authorized to correct the date in the motion for appeal so as to show the proper date of the judgment from which the devolutive appeal is taken, that is, May 31, 1962. Appellee’s motion is denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellee moves to dismiss appellant’s devolutive appeal on the ground that on June 14, 1962, plaintiff appealed from a judgment rendered by the First City Court of New Orleans, which judgment it is alleged in the motion of appeal was dated November 25, 1958. However, in appellant’s return to the motion to dismiss, counsel states that the judgment of the lower court was rendered on May 31, 1962, but that, through inadvertence, the date of the judgment is incorrectly set forth as November 25, 1958. Counsel prays that he be allowed to correct the erroneous date.

It would be foolhardy for a party to appeal from a judgment in which it had been awarded a judgment as prayed for. It necessarily follows that there was a clerical error which is perfectly clear to this court since the record containing both judgments is before us. LSA-C.C.P. art. 865 reads as follows:

“Construction of pleadings

Every pleading shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.”

Accordingly, appellant is authorized to correct the date in the motion for appeal so as to show the proper date of the judgment from which the devolutive appeal is taken, that is, May 31, 1962. Appellee’s motion is denied.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 So. 2d 31, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-auto-service-inc-v-lombard-lactapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack