General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.

723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 11
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 4, 1999
DocketSC 16060
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 723 A.2d 810 (General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc., 723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 11 (Colo. 1999).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 701 (AC 17345), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[955]*955The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16060. William F. Corrigan, in support of the petition. Joseph T. Sweeney and Daniel P. Scapellati, in opposition. Decided January 4, 1999

“Did the application for automobile insurance with liability limits higher than the uninsured-underinsured motorist limits constitute a written rejection of the right to uninsured-underinsured motorist coverage equal to the amount of liability coverage?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-accident-insurance-v-powers-bolles-houlihan-hartline-inc-conn-1999.