General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.

723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 11

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 4, 1999·No. SC 16060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 701 (AC 17345), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[955]*955The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16060. William F. Corrigan, in support of the petition. Joseph T. Sweeney and Daniel P. Scapellati, in opposition. Decided January 4, 1999

“Did the application for automobile insurance with liability limits higher than the uninsured-underinsured motorist limits constitute a written rejection of the right to uninsured-underinsured motorist coverage equal to the amount of liability coverage?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 701 (AC 17345), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[955]*955The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16060. William F. Corrigan, in support of the petition. Joseph T. Sweeney and Daniel P. Scapellati, in opposition. Decided January 4, 1999

“Did the application for automobile insurance with liability limits higher than the uninsured-underinsured motorist limits constitute a written rejection of the right to uninsured-underinsured motorist coverage equal to the amount of liability coverage?”

General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc., 723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 11 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

723 A.2d 810 (General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related