General Accident Insurance Company v. Mary Lou Namesnik, and Robert and Cornell Whitlow

799 F.2d 539
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1986·No. 85-2021·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

799 F.2d 539

GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mary Lou NAMESNIK, and Robert and Cornell Whitlow,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 85-2021, 85-2022, 85-2166 and 85-2242.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 1986.

Larry L. Smith, Calvin L. Raup, O'Connor, Cavanaugh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A., David D. Dodge, Mark R. Lieberman, Eaton, Lazarus, Dodge & Lowrey, Ltd., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Dougal B. Reeves, Jr., Gregg Clarke Gibbons, Simon, Reeves & Roberts, Scottsdale, Ariz., for defendants-appellants.

Prior report: 790 F.2d 1397.

Before WALLACE, KENNEDY, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Footnote 1 on page 7 of the opinion filed June 2, 1986, is hereby deleted.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

General Accident Insurance Company v. Mary Lou Namesnik, and Robert and Cornell Whitlow, 799 F.2d 539 (9th Cir. 1986).

799 F.2d 539 (General Accident Insurance Company v. Mary Lou Namesnik, and Robert and Cornell Whitlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dannenfeldt
778 F. Supp. 484 (D. Arizona, 1991)
Sparling v. Hoffman Construction Co.
864 F.2d 635 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)