GENERAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Price

85 S.E.2d 609, 91 Ga. App. 370, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 743
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 1955
Docket35386
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 85 S.E.2d 609 (GENERAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GENERAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Price, 85 S.E.2d 609, 91 Ga. App. 370, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 743 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Quillian, J.

1. The plaintiff failed to prove the fair market value of the chattel converted; therefore the verdict for the plaintiff was unauthorized. The only evidence tending to establish its value was the price at which it had been sold some five months previous to the time the plaintiff alleges he was wrongfully deprived of its possession, and the defendant was not a party to that sale nor concerned in it. “As a general rule, the selling price of an article, though relevant upon the question, is not, when standing alone, sufficient to establish market value.” Collins & Glenville R. Co. v. Beasley, 36 Ga. App. 241, 243 (136 S. E. 167), and cases therein cited; Aircraft Apartments, Inc. v. Haverty Furniture Co., 71 Ga. App. 560 (31 S. E. 2d 419). Especially is this true when, as in this case, the chattel has a fluctuating, rather than a stable, value, such as an automobile.

2. Since the plaintiff failed to prove the fair market value of the automobile converted, there was no evidence from which the jury could find what interest, if anjq the plaintiff had in the automobile; and the charge authorizing the jury to find that the plaintiff had an interest in the automobile, from the mere fact that he had made certain payments thereon, was error.

3. A money verdict in a trover case in which separate amounts are returned for principal and interest is contrary to law. Adams v. Webb, 72 Ga. App. 66 (3) (32 S. E. 2d 922); Beaver v. Magid, 56 Ga. App. 272 (192 S. E. 497).

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Flaum
227 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.
226 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E.2d 609, 91 Ga. App. 370, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-acceptance-corporation-v-price-gactapp-1955.