Gener v. State
This text of 84 So. 3d 1263 (Gener v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bryan Charles Gener (“Gener”) appeals the trial court’s order denying as untimely his “Motion For New Trials” in case numbers 05-9595 and 07-20311. As the trial court correctly noted, a motion for a new trial in a non-death penalty case must be made within ten days after rendition of the verdict or a finding by the court. See State v. Snyder, 453 So.2d 546, 546-47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Because Gener filed his motion more than ten days after rendition of the verdict or a finding by the court, and because the ten-day limit is jurisdictional, we affirm the order on appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 So. 3d 1263, 2012 WL 1314179, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gener-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.