Gene W. Doeling v. Nancy A. Nessa

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 2010
Docket10-6009
StatusPublished

This text of Gene W. Doeling v. Nancy A. Nessa (Gene W. Doeling v. Nancy A. Nessa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gene W. Doeling v. Nancy A. Nessa, (bap8 2010).

Opinion

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6009

In re: * * Nancy A. Nessa, * * Debtor. * * Gene W. Doeling, * Appeal from the * United States Trustee - Appellant, * Bankruptcy Court for the * District of Minnesota v. * * Nancy A. Nessa, * * Debtor - Appellee. *

Submitted: March 11, 2010 Filed: April 9, 2010

Before SCHERMER, VENTERS and SALADINO, Bankruptcy Judges

SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge

Gene W. Doeling, Chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) for the bankruptcy estate of Nancy A. Nessa (the “Debtor”) appeals from an Order Overruling Objection to Exemption. The bankruptcy court1 overruled the Trustee’s objection to the Debtor’s claim of an exemption of her inherited IRA account under section 522(d)(12) of the Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). We have jurisdiction over this appeal from the final order of the bankruptcy court. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(b). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

ISSUE

The issue on appeal is whether the Debtor’s inherited IRA qualifies as exempt pursuant to section 522(d)(12) of the Bankruptcy Code. We conclude that it does.

BACKGROUND

The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in January 2009. Prior to that filing, the Debtor’s father, Robert Borrett, had established an individual retirement account (“IRA”) pursuant to Section 408 of Title 26 of the United States Code (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The Debtor was named the beneficiary of that IRA. After her father died in August 2008, and before filing her bankruptcy petition, the Debtor made a trustee-to- trustee transfer of the IRA to her own account at Wells Fargo; she did not “roll over” the account to her own IRA nor did she take any distributions from her father’s IRA.2 The Debtor has not contributed any of her own funds to the inherited account, and any withdrawals will be taxable to her.

1 The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota. 2 In fact, the beneficiary of an inherited account may not treat the account as his or her own by making contributions to it or rolling over the account into another retirement plan. See 26 U.S.C. § 408(d)(3)(C).

2 The Debtor claimed the inherited account as exempt in her Schedule E, pursuant to section 522(d)(12) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Trustee objected to the Debtor’s claim of an exemption for the inherited account.

The bankruptcy court overruled the Trustee’s objection to the Debtor’s claimed exemption. It explained that the transfer of the contents of the Debtor’s father’s account to the inherited account was a trustee-to-trustee transfer as described in the Internal Revenue Service’s Publication 590. Individual Retirement Arrangements, (IRAs), Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Publication 590, at 20. The bankruptcy court then concluded that the transfer from the Debtor’s father’s account retained their character as retirement funds. Accordingly, it concluded that the funds in the account qualified for an exemption under Bankruptcy Code section 522(d)(12).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

We review the bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law de novo. Alexander v. Jenson-Carter (In re Alexander), 239 B.R. 911, 913 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1999), aff’d 236 F.3d 431 (8th Cir. 2001). The facts are not in dispute.

DISCUSSION

A debtor’s bankruptcy estate is defined broadly to include all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property, as well as other specific interests of the debtor. 11 U.S.C. §541. Bankruptcy Code section 522 allows the debtor to exempt certain property from his estate. 11 U.S.C. §522. Pursuant to section 522(d)(12), the debtor may take an exemption for:

3 [r]etirement funds to the extent those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

11 U.S.C. §522(d)(12). Accordingly, section 522(d)(12) imposes two requirements before a debtor may claim an exemption under that section: (1) the amount the debtor seeks to exempt must be retirement funds; and (2) the retirement funds must be in an account that is exempt from taxation under one of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code set forth therein.

The Debtor’s father’s account was an “individual retirement account”, as that term is defined under section 408(a). 26 U.S.C. §408(a). It is now classified as an “inherited individual retirement account” because the Debtor acquired the account by reason of her father’s death. 26 U.S.C. §408(d)(3)(C).

Retirement Funds

The bankruptcy court correctly determined that the amounts in the inherited account were “retirement funds”. The Trustee does not dispute the bankruptcy court’s determination that, the amounts in the Debtor’s father’s IRA were his retirement funds prior to his death. He suggests, however, that to retain their status as retirement funds under section 522(d)(12) in the Debtor’s inherited account, the contents of the inherited account would have to have been contributed by the Debtor or be part of the Debtor’s retirement plan. Bankruptcy Code section 522(d)(12) makes no such distinction. Section 522(d)(12) requires that the account be comprised of retirement funds, but it does not specify that they must be the debtor’s retirement funds. The Trustee’s definition of retirement funds would impermissibly limit the statute beyond its plain language. U.S. v. Ron Pair Enterprises, 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989)(“where, as here, the statute’s language is plain, ‘the sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms’”)(citation omitted). In

4 accordance with the terms of Bankruptcy Code section 522(d)(12), even though the contents of the Debtor’s inherited account were the Debtor’s father’s retirement funds, not the Debtor’s own retirement funds, they remain in form and substance, “retirement funds.”3

Exempt from Taxation

The Debtor’s inherited account is exempt from taxation under Internal Revenue Code section 408. The Trustee acknowledged that the Debtor’s inherited account is not taxed until the Debtor makes a withdrawal. However, he suggested that the inherited account does not meet the requirements of Bankruptcy Code section 522(d)(12), reasoning that the “rules are different. . . regarding the use, distribution, and taxation of funds in an IRA versus an Inherited IRA.” It is irrelevant whether a traditional IRA and an inherited IRA have different rules regarding minimum required distributions. Section 408(e) of the Internal Revenue Code provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ny individual retirement account is exempt from taxation.” 26 U.S.C. §408(e)(1)(emphasis added).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
489 U.S. 235 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Alexander v. Jensen-Carter (In Re Alexander)
239 B.R. 911 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
In Re Chilton
426 B.R. 612 (E.D. Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gene W. Doeling v. Nancy A. Nessa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-w-doeling-v-nancy-a-nessa-bap8-2010.