Gene Spitzmiller v. Julia Hawkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gene Spitzmiller v. Julia Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 183 F.3d 912
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 15, 1997·No. 97-1991·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 97-1991WM _____________

Gene W. Spitzmiller, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Julia Hawkins; David Harrison; Paul * Boudreau; Missouri Personnel Advisory * [UNPUBLISHED] Board, * * Appellees. * _____________

Submitted: October 6, 1997 Filed: October 15, 1997 _____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

After Gene W. Spitzmiller was dismissed from his position as a hearing examiner for Missouri's Personnel Advisory Board (PAB), Spitzmiller filed actions in federal district court, in Missouri state court, and before the PAB, alleging his dismissal was unlawful. The district court ordered the federal action stayed pending disposition of the state actions, and Spitzmiller appeals. Because the district court's order was based on abstention and Spitzmiller has now dismissed the state proceedings, the district court's order has expired by its own terms and we conclude the appeal is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Spitzmiller's appeal as moot.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gene Spitzmiller v. Julia Hawkins, (8th Cir. 1997).

Gene Spitzmiller v. Julia Hawkins (Gene Spitzmiller v. Julia Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.