Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2011·No. 09-35190·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GENE R. MCLEOD,  Plaintiff-Appellant,

No. 09-35190

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,  D.C. No.

9:07-CV-52-JCL

Commissioner of Social Security ORDER

Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

Filed February 8, 2011

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, A. Wallace Tashima, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The last sentence of the order filed February 4, 2011 stating “No petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained, and the mandate shall issue in due course” is withdrawn so that the court can consider Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing.

Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing is deemed to be appropriately filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue, (9th Cir. 2011).

Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue (Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.