Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue
This text of Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue (Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GENE R. MCLEOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 09-35190 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, D.C. No. 9:07-CV-52-JCL Commissioner of Social Security ORDER Administration, Defendant-Appellee. Filed February 8, 2011
Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, A. Wallace Tashima, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The last sentence of the order filed February 4, 2011 stating “No petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained, and the mandate shall issue in due course” is withdrawn so that the court can consider Appellee’s peti- tion for panel rehearing.
Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing is deemed to be appropriately filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gene McLeod v. Michael Astrue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-mcleod-v-michael-astrue-ca9-2011.