Gene Lisco v. Thomas White D/B/A Cecor Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2002
Docket13-01-00717-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gene Lisco v. Thomas White D/B/A Cecor Services (Gene Lisco v. Thomas White D/B/A Cecor Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gene Lisco v. Thomas White D/B/A Cecor Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion


NUMBER 13-01-717-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI


GENE LISCO , Appellant,
v.

THOMAS WHITE D/B/A CECOR SERVICES , Appellee.


On appeal from the 75th District Court

of Liberty County, Texas.


O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, GENE LISCO , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 75th District Court of Liberty County, Texas, in cause number 55418 . No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On January 3, 2002 , notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 7th day of February, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gene Lisco v. Thomas White D/B/A Cecor Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-lisco-v-thomas-white-dba-cecor-services-texapp-2002.