Gene E. Dudley, Sr. v. Mitchell Powers
This text of 49 F. App'x 91 (Gene E. Dudley, Sr. v. Mitchell Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Texas inmate Gene E. Dudley appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP’s) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 grant of relief from automatic stay, and the court’s 2 subsequent denial of Dudley’s motion to reconsider.
Dudley argues the BAP lacked jurisdiction to hear his appeal because he never consented to its jurisdiction, but instead requested review by the district court. We conclude the BAP properly exercised jurisdiction, because Dudley failed to request district court review on a separate document at the time he filed the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(c); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8001(e). Furthermore, we agree with the BAP, for the reasons noted in its order, this appeal is moot.
*92 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny as moot Ruby Powers’s motion for misjoinder.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-e-dudley-sr-v-mitchell-powers-ca8-2002.