Gene Dennis A/K/A Gene Dennis Villarreal and Gene Dennis Investment Corporation v. Cresensio Zuniga, Jr. and Wife, Maria Zuniga

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 2, 2009
Docket13-05-00393-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gene Dennis A/K/A Gene Dennis Villarreal and Gene Dennis Investment Corporation v. Cresensio Zuniga, Jr. and Wife, Maria Zuniga (Gene Dennis A/K/A Gene Dennis Villarreal and Gene Dennis Investment Corporation v. Cresensio Zuniga, Jr. and Wife, Maria Zuniga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gene Dennis A/K/A Gene Dennis Villarreal and Gene Dennis Investment Corporation v. Cresensio Zuniga, Jr. and Wife, Maria Zuniga, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-05-00393-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

GENE DENNIS A/K/A GENE DENNIS VILLARREAL

AND GENE DENNIS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Appellant,



v.



CRESENSIO ZUNIGA, JR. AND WIFE, MARIA ZUNIGA, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 15, 2008. On September 23, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 2nd day of April, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gene Dennis A/K/A Gene Dennis Villarreal and Gene Dennis Investment Corporation v. Cresensio Zuniga, Jr. and Wife, Maria Zuniga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-dennis-aka-gene-dennis-villarreal-and-gene-de-texapp-2009.