Gene Cashman Athena Sutsos v. City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation

Ninth Circuit

Gene Cashman Athena Sutsos v. City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation

415 F.3d 1027, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14322, 2005 WL 1653734

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2005·No. 03-15066·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This court suspended consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc pending the Supreme Court’s issuance of a decision in Lingle v. Chevron USA — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2074, 161 L.Ed.2d 876 (2005). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Lingle requires us to grant the City of Cotati’s petition for rehearing and to withdraw our opinion' filed July 15, 2004.

We affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of the City of Cotati. See, e.g., Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, 370 F.3d 837, 850 (9th Cir.2004) (affirming district court’s judgment after trial on a different ground). Cashman’s takings claim, which alleges that the City of Cotati’s mobilehome park rent control ordinance effects an unconstitutional regulatory taking by failing to substantially advance a legitimate government interest, is foreclosed by Lingle. 125 S.Ct. at 2087 (holding that the “substantially advances formula is not a valid takings test” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Our prior opinion filed July 15, 2004 is WITHDRAWN. The district court’s judgment in favor of the City of Cotati is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This court suspended consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc pending the Supreme Court’s issuance of a decision in Lingle v. Chevron USA — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2074, 161 L.Ed.2d 876 (2005). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Lingle requires us to grant the City of Cotati’s petition for rehearing and to withdraw our opinion' filed July 15, 2004.

We affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of the City of Cotati. See, e.g., Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, 370 F.3d 837, 850 (9th Cir.2004) (affirming district court’s judgment after trial on a different ground). Cashman’s takings claim, which alleges that the City of Cotati’s mobilehome park rent control ordinance effects an unconstitutional regulatory taking by failing to substantially advance a legitimate government interest, is foreclosed by Lingle. 125 S.Ct. at 2087 (holding that the “substantially advances formula is not a valid takings test” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Our prior opinion filed July 15, 2004 is WITHDRAWN. The district court’s judgment in favor of the City of Cotati is AFFIRMED.

Gene Cashman Athena Sutsos v. City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation, 415 F.3d 1027, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14322, 2005 WL 1653734 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

415 F.3d 1027 (Gene Cashman Athena Sutsos v. City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related