Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc.

356 F. App'x 890

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2009·No. 08-3035·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gene Brehmer appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act and state law. After reviewing the record de novo, and viewing it in the light most favorable to Brehmer, see Woods v. DaimleChrysler Corp., 409 F.3d 984, 990 (8th Cir.2005) (summary judgment standard of review); Koch Eng’g Co. v. Gibralter Cas. Co., 78 F.3d 1291, 1294 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review for determination of state law), we *891 conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gene Brehmer appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act and state law. After reviewing the record de novo, and viewing it in the light most favorable to Brehmer, see Woods v. DaimleChrysler Corp., 409 F.3d 984, 990 (8th Cir.2005) (summary judgment standard of review); Koch Eng’g Co. v. Gibralter Cas. Co., 78 F.3d 1291, 1294 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review for determination of state law), we *891 conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc., 356 F. App'x 890 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

356 F. App'x 890 (Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related