Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
This text of 356 F. App'x 890 (Gene Brehmer v. Xcel Energy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gene Brehmer appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act and state law. After reviewing the record de novo, and viewing it in the light most favorable to Brehmer, see Woods v. DaimleChrysler Corp., 409 F.3d 984, 990 (8th Cir.2005) (summary judgment standard of review); Koch Eng’g Co. v. Gibralter Cas. Co., 78 F.3d 1291, 1294 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review for determination of state law), we *891 conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F. App'x 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-brehmer-v-xcel-energy-inc-ca8-2009.