Gencola v. Lebov
This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 43 (Gencola v. Lebov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not now necessary to pass upon the applicability or constitutionality of the recent Special Act placing upon the adjoining property owner "the duty of keeping sidewalks in said city free from snow and ice".
The complaint alleges "a defective, unsafe, dangerous and slippery condition of said sidewalk .... due to the negligence and carelessness of the said defendant". The testimony disclosed that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of ordinary care under the existing circumstances; and it does not establish any negligence on the part of the defendant. Incidentally, and aside from the question of liability, it discloses trivial and doubtful injuries.
Judgment is for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gencola-v-lebov-connsuperct-1936.