Gencola v. Lebov

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 43
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided May 20, 1936·No. File No. 49583·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

It is not now necessary to pass upon the applicability or constitutionality of the recent Special Act placing upon the adjoining property owner "the duty of keeping sidewalks in said city free from snow and ice".

The complaint alleges "a defective, unsafe, dangerous and slippery condition of said sidewalk .... due to the negligence and carelessness of the said defendant". The testimony disclosed that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of ordinary care under the existing circumstances; and it does not establish any negligence on the part of the defendant. Incidentally, and aside from the question of liability, it discloses trivial and doubtful injuries.

Judgment is for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gencola v. Lebov, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 43 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 43 (Gencola v. Lebov) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingriselli v. Frisina, No. Cv01-0507793 (Mar. 15, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 3452 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Armenis v. Brennan, Dichter, No. Cv 33 37 13 (Feb. 13, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 775 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Young v. Mukon, No. Cv940538420 (Nov. 15, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11208-Q (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Lovett v. Frankel, No. 503526 (Jan. 6, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 13 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)