Genao v. Rivera
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Gabino Genao, Plaintiff, 20-CV-10563 (GBD) (VF) -against- ORDER Rivera et al., Defendants. VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge: For the reasons stated at the telephonic status conference held before the Court on February 1, 2023, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff's request to submit an amended complaint (see ECF No. 34). Because no case management plan was ever entered in this action, this request is governed by Rule 15, which provides that the Court should freely grant leave to amend “when justice so requires.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2); Sacerdote v. New York Univ., 9 F.4th 95, 115 (2d Cir. 2021) (“The period of ‘liberal’ amendment ends if the district court issues a scheduling order setting a date after which no amendment will be permitted.”’). Plaintiff's amended complaint is due by no later than Friday, March 17, 2023. As stated at the conference, the Court will not permit any extensions to this deadline. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York February 1, 2023 \ | \ \ ni) \ \ \ \) WAR A VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Genao v. Rivera (Genao v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.