Gempel v. Commissioner

1978 T.C. Memo. 7, 37 T.C.M. 22, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 505
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1978
DocketDocket No. 8190-73.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1978 T.C. Memo. 7 (Gempel v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gempel v. Commissioner, 1978 T.C. Memo. 7, 37 T.C.M. 22, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 505 (tax 1978).

Opinion

GORDON L. GEMPEL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Gempel v. Commissioner
Docket No. 8190-73.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1978-7; 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 505; 37 T.C.M. (CCH) 22; T.C.M. (RIA) 780007;
January 9, 1978, Filed

*505 Petitioner intentionally failed to file income tax returns for the years 1966 through 1971 due to a dispute with the Commissioner over his tax liability for a year not before the Court. Held, failure to file income tax returns was due to willful neglect and intentional disregard of rules and regulations, and additions to tax under 6651(a) and 6653(a) upheld.

Gordon L. Gempel, pro se.
Robert D. Kaiser, for the respondent.

IRWIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

IRWIN, Judge: In a notice of deficiency mailed August 15, 1973, respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's income tax*506 returns for 1966-1971, and additions to tax for those years under sections 6651(a), 6653(a), and 6654(a) 1 as follows:

Additions to Tax
SectionSectionSection
YearDeficiency6651(a)6653(a)6654(a)
1966$1,799.10$ 249.78$ 89.96$ 19.36
19672,792.70448.18139.6449.68
19684,807.85801.96240.3995.33
19694,421.77605.44222.0963.37
19708,398.541,474.63419.93229.62
19719,211.571,677.89460.58255.25

The parties have resolved the deficiencies by stipulations. Thus, the sole issue remaining for our consideration is whether petitioner's failure to file his income tax returns for the years in issue was due to reasonable cause or to willful neglect or intentional disregard of rules and regulations. 2

Petitioner also requests the privilege of filing joint returns for the year 1969, 1970 and 1971.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Gordon L. Gempel (hereafter*507 petitioner) was a resident of Harbor Beach, Mich., at the time of filing his petition. Petitioner filed estimated tax returns for the years in issue and paid on the estimates as filed. However, petitioner did not file individual income tax returns for the taxable years 1966 to 1971, inclusive. Respondent, therefore, computed petitioner's tax using the married, filing separate status.

Petitioner is married and a self-employed businessman operating an insurance agency in Harbor Beach, Mich., under the name Gordon Gempel Insurance Agency. Petitioner refused to file his returns because of an administrative dispute with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to a prior year not in issue. It is unquestioned that petitioner acted in good faith and believed he was justified in not filing his returns in order to force the Internal Revenue Service to resolve the dispute which was due in large part to the Service's inattention to petitioner's request for assistance and to claims for refunds. Petitioner was continually in contact with the Service during the entire period, and at no time did he attempt to conceal the fact he did not file and at all times he made available his business*508 and personal records to the Service.

OPINION

Petitioner requests the privilege of filing joint returns for the years 1969, 1970, and 1971 on the grounds that the statute of limitations had not run on those years at the time of the audit in 1972. This issue was previously decided against petitioner by Court order dated December 4, 1975.

Section 6651(a) 3 imposes an addition to tax for failure to file unless such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. The regulations provide little indication of what constitutes reasonable cause, stating simply that "if the taxpayer exercised ordinary care and prudence and was nevertheless unable to file the return within the proscribed time, then the delay is due to a reasonable cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glowinski v. Commissioner
25 T.C. 934 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Muste v. Commissioner
35 T.C. 913 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
Fischer v. Commissioner
50 T.C. 164 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1978 T.C. Memo. 7, 37 T.C.M. 22, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gempel-v-commissioner-tax-1978.