Gemmell v. Fox

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gemmell v. Fox

88 A. 426, 241 Pa. 146, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 751

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 19, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 103

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 88 A. 426 (Gemmell v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gemmell v. Fox, 88 A. 426, 241 Pa. 146, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 751 (Pa. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in this case to take it out of the established rule that a preliminary injunction will not be disturbed where there was apparently sufficient ground for the action of the court below in awarding it. In the present case the learned chancellor said, in continuing the injunction, that, upon final hearing, when he would have the benefit of testimony on the part of the respondents, he might reach a different conclusion. Let the status quo remain until that hearing.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in this case to take it out of the established rule that a preliminary injunction will not be disturbed where there was apparently sufficient ground for the action of the court below in awarding it. In the present case the learned chancellor said, in continuing the injunction, that, upon final hearing, when he would have the benefit of testimony on the part of the respondents, he might reach a different conclusion. Let the status quo remain until that hearing.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A. 426, 241 Pa. 146, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gemmell-v-fox-pa-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack