Gemma v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Gemma v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court

500 A.2d 954, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 687

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedNovember 14, 1985

DocketNo. 85-509-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 500 A.2d 954 (Gemma v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gemma v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court, 500 A.2d 954, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 687 (R.I. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

[955]*955ORDER

The petitioner, a member of the Rhode Island Bar, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari with this court containing various requests for relief in respect to a complaint presently pending against him with this court’s Chief Disciplinary Counsel.

After carefully considering the petition, and the memoranda of all parties, we hereby direct that the following order shall enter:

(1) The petition for writ of certiorari is denied, because there is no ruling or decision of any tribunal or body to be reviewed.

(2) This denial of the petition for cer-tiorari is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to submit to the Disciplinary Board his request for a public hearing on the pending complaint, he having waived the protection of the confidentiality provision of Rule 42-21.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[955]*955ORDER

The petitioner, a member of the Rhode Island Bar, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari with this court containing various requests for relief in respect to a complaint presently pending against him with this court’s Chief Disciplinary Counsel.

After carefully considering the petition, and the memoranda of all parties, we hereby direct that the following order shall enter:

(1) The petition for writ of certiorari is denied, because there is no ruling or decision of any tribunal or body to be reviewed.

(2) This denial of the petition for cer-tiorari is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to submit to the Disciplinary Board his request for a public hearing on the pending complaint, he having waived the protection of the confidentiality provision of Rule 42-21.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

500 A.2d 954, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gemma-v-disciplinary-board-of-the-supreme-court-ri-1985.