GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Realpha Tech Corp.

S.D. New York

GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Realpha Tech Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 25, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-02271·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ED |) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | FLECTRONICALLY FIL SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK inOc#: ane PSE ie a ete ENS nh □□□ at ee ie ee Be □□ 2 FILED: 2-22") GEM YIELD BAHAMAS LIMITED, \D kre FILED: 2 25-2>_ | Plaintiff,

-against- 25-CV-227 1 REALPHA TECH CORP., etc., Defendants. wom tet te ee ee ee em □□ er ee ee ee ee ee eee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: LJ The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990), if The exact nature and, depending upon the exact nature, the citizenship of an alleged Bahamian entity. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before April 1, 2025 of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. / Dated: + March 25, 2025 hu. tl Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ED |) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | FLECTRONICALLY FIL SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK inOc#: ane PSE ie a ete ENS nh □□□ at ee ie ee Be □□ 2 FILED: 2-22") GEM YIELD BAHAMAS LIMITED, \D kre FILED: 2 25-2>_ | Plaintiff,

-against- 25-CV-227 1 REALPHA TECH CORP., etc., Defendants. wom tet te ee ee ee em □□ er ee ee ee ee ee eee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: LJ The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990), if The exact nature and, depending upon the exact nature, the citizenship of an alleged Bahamian entity. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before April 1, 2025 of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. / Dated: + March 25, 2025 hu. tl Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Realpha Tech Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Realpha Tech Corp. (GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Realpha Tech Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related