Gelrod v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gelrod v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

629 So. 2d 251, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12395, 1993 WL 517221

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1993·No. No. 93-35·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order adjudicating Appellant’s minor child dependent. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services correctly concedes that reversal of the order is required because the order fails to state the facts upon which the court’s findings are made. Luszczyk v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 576 So.2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); § 39.409(3), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.330(g); see Fielder v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 596 So.2d 520 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The order is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order adjudicating Appellant’s minor child dependent. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services correctly concedes that reversal of the order is required because the order fails to state the facts upon which the court’s findings are made. Luszczyk v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 576 So.2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); § 39.409(3), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.330(g); see Fielder v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 596 So.2d 520 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The order is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded.

Gelrod v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 629 So. 2d 251, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12395, 1993 WL 517221 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 251 (Gelrod v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related