Gelpcke v. . Quentell
This text of 74 N.Y. 599 (Gelpcke v. . Quentell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 602 RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
ANDREWS and MILLER, JJ., concur.
EARL, J., concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.
CHURCH, Ch. J., and FOLGER, J., dissent.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.Y. 599, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gelpcke-v-quentell-ny-1878.