Gelpcke v. . Quentell
74 N.Y. 599, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 785
Opinions
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 602 RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
ANDREWS and MILLER, JJ., concur.
EARL, J., concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.
CHURCH, Ch. J., and FOLGER, J., dissent.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gelpcke v. . Quentell, 74 N.Y. 599, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 785 (N.Y. 1878).
74 N.Y. 599 (Gelpcke v. . Quentell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matousek v. Bank of Europe Trust Co.
234 A.D. 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Lamborn v. National Park Bank
148 N.E. 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Lamborn v. National Park Bank
123 Misc. 211 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
American Steel Co. v. Irving Nat. Bank
266 F. 41 (Second Circuit, 1920)
Terwilliger v. Ontario, Carbondale & Scranton Railroad
43 N.E. 432 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Germania National Bank v. Taaks
38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 260 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)