Gelman v. Borruso
Opinion
USVL-SUINY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: |{/ 2! [ (4
CLIFFORD L. GELMAN, M_D., Petitioner, No. 19-CV-10649 (RA) ORDER THOMAS JOSEPH BORRUSO., Respondent.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. On November 18, 2019, Petitioner filed a complaint seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. Petitioner has not yet docketed an affidavit of service. Confirmation proceedings for arbitration awards must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). It is hereby: ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which he intends to support his petition for confirmation by December 6, 2019. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on January 3, 2020. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on January 10, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent. SO ORDERED. / Dated: | November 21, 2019 /' □□ New York, New York ) eee Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gelman v. Borruso (Gelman v. Borruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.