Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance
This text of 357 F. App'x 512 (Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order entering judgment in Plaintiffs’ action against Defendant and declaring repair costs to be the proper measure of covered loss owed to Plaintiffs by Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Gellman v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., 602 F.Supp.2d 705 (W.D.N.C.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
357 F. App'x 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gellman-v-cincinnati-insurance-ca4-2009.