Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance

357 F. App'x 512
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2009
DocketNo. 09-1434
StatusPublished

This text of 357 F. App'x 512 (Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance, 357 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order entering judgment in Plaintiffs’ action against Defendant and declaring repair costs to be the proper measure of covered loss owed to Plaintiffs by Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Gellman v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., 602 F.Supp.2d 705 (W.D.N.C.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance
602 F. Supp. 2d 705 (W.D. North Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 F. App'x 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gellman-v-cincinnati-insurance-ca4-2009.