Gellman Bros. v. United States
This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 470 (Gellman Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The merchandise consists of various articles imported from Japan which were invoiced and entered at the ex-factory prices. The appraiser of merchandise advanced the value by the addition of inland freight, buying commissions, and other charges.
When these cases were called for trial, it was stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties that the entered value represents the export value and that there was no higher foreign value.
On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value in each instance was the entered value.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 Cust. Ct. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gellman-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1959.