Gellman Bros. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 470
United States Customs Court·Decided July 14, 1959·No. Reap. Dec. 9481; Entry No. A 209, etc.·Published

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The merchandise consists of various articles imported from Japan which were invoiced and entered at the ex-factory prices. The appraiser of merchandise advanced the value by the addition of inland freight, buying commissions, and other charges.

When these cases were called for trial, it was stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties that the entered value represents the export value and that there was no higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value in each instance was the entered value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gellman Bros. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 470 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 470 (Gellman Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.