Geller v. Schulman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geller v. Schulman

280 A.D. 933, 115 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4280

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In this action the complaint purports to contain two causes of action, one to recover for money had and received and the other to compel specific performance of a contract relating to real property or to impress a trust on such property. Order dismissing the first cause of action for insufficiency, with leave to plead over, and dismissing the second cause of action pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Statute of Limitations), affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this action the complaint purports to contain two causes of action, one to recover for money had and received and the other to compel specific performance of a contract relating to real property or to impress a trust on such property. Order dismissing the first cause of action for insufficiency, with leave to plead over, and dismissing the second cause of action pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Statute of Limitations), affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Geller v. Schulman, 280 A.D. 933, 115 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

280 A.D. 933 (Geller v. Schulman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related