Gelco Convention Services, Inc. v. Ray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gelco Convention Services, Inc. v. Ray

488 So. 2d 675, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8073

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1949

StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 675 (Gelco Convention Services, Inc. v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gelco Convention Services, Inc. v. Ray, 488 So. 2d 675, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a partial summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees/defendants in the appellant/plaintiffs action for breach of an oral contract and fraud.¹ The entry of partial summary judgment was predicated on the trial court’s finding that “the oral agreement as claimed in plaintiffs complaint is an agreement which will not be completed in a year, and is therefore barred by the Statute of Frauds.”

We have carefully considered the briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the pleadings, interrogatories and depositions before the trial court conclusively established the absence of any genuine issues of material fact and that the appellees were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a partial summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees/defendants in the appellant/plaintiffs action for breach of an oral contract and fraud.¹ The entry of partial summary judgment was predicated on the trial court’s finding that “the oral agreement as claimed in plaintiffs complaint is an agreement which will not be completed in a year, and is therefore barred by the Statute of Frauds.”

We have carefully considered the briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the pleadings, interrogatories and depositions before the trial court conclusively established the absence of any genuine issues of material fact and that the appellees were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 So. 2d 675, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gelco-convention-services-inc-v-ray-fladistctapp-1986.