Gelardos v. Burr

Fourth Circuit

Gelardos v. Burr

432 F. App'x 201

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2011·No. No. 10-7710·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marinos Gelardos appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), for failure to pay the partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gelardos v. Johnson, No. 3:10-cv-00494-RLW (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marinos Gelardos appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), for failure to pay the partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gelardos v. Johnson, No. 3:10-cv-00494-RLW (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gelardos v. Burr, 432 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

432 F. App'x 201 (Gelardos v. Burr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related