Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.

56 N.E.2d 558, 293 N.Y. 217, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1305
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*218 Per Curiam.

No motion was made by the defendant at the close of the case for dismissal of the complaint or direction of a verdict. This was a concession by the defendant that there was evidence which warranted submission of the case to the jury. In that state of the record, the Appellate Division was without power to dismiss the complaint. (Eno v. Klein, 236 N. Y. 543.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified so as to order a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co., 56 N.E.2d 558, 293 N.Y. 217, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1305 (N.Y. 1944).

56 N.E.2d 558 (Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Door Knob Realty, Inc. v. Northrop
86 Misc. 675 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
In re the Estate of McCrea
47 Misc. 2d 361 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)