Gelacio Panzo v. Loretta E. Lynch

624 F. App'x 569
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2015·No. 14-71976·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gelacio Delores Panzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his request for voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of Panzo’s application for voluntary departure where Panzo presents no question of law that would invoke our jurisdiction. See Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1003 (9th Cir.2011) (overruled on other grounds by Moncrieffe v. Holder, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1678, 185 L.Ed.2d 727 (2013)) (this court has no jurisdiction to review discretionary denials of voluntary departure, but retains jurisdiction to review questions of law or constitutional challenges to denials of such relief); see also Corro-Barragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d .1174, 1176-77 (9th Cir.2013) (same).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gelacio Panzo v. Loretta E. Lynch, 624 F. App'x 569 (9th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 569 (Gelacio Panzo v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gil v. Holder
651 F.3d 1000 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Moncrieffe v. Holder
133 S. Ct. 1678 (Supreme Court, 2013)