Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Geisenheim v. Dodge

Geisenheim v. Dodge

19 Jones & S. 536
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 8, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Jones & S. 536 (Geisenheim v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geisenheim v. Dodge, 19 Jones & S. 536 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

None of the appellants’ exceptions are well taken. The judgment is right, and must be affirmed with costs, on the opinion of the referee, which correctly disposed of the questions involved. Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ. (See ante, p. 169).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Jones & S. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geisenheim-v-dodge-nysuperctnyc-1884.