Geimer v. Pastrovich
110 F.3d 530, 1997 WL 154013
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1997
DocketNo. 90-2784EMSL
StatusPublished
This text of 110 F.3d 530 (Geimer v. Pastrovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Geimer v. Pastrovich, 110 F.3d 530, 1997 WL 154013 (8th Cir. 1997).
Opinion
ORDER
Although inadvertent, the court recognizes its ultimate responsibility for the long delay in bringing Kenneth Geimer’s suggestion for rehearing en banc to the forefront for a ruling on the merits.
Having carefully considered the matter, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Rehearing by the panel is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 F.3d 530, 1997 WL 154013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geimer-v-pastrovich-ca8-1997.