Geil v. Stevens

48 Cal. 590, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 209
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 4,148·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

By the statute (Sec. 2,803 Hitt. Gen. Laws) the Sheriff is allowed certain designated fees, and he is also allowed “such further compensation for his trouble and expense in taking possession of property under an attachment or execution, or other process, and preserving the same as the Court from which the writ or order may issue shall certify to be just and reasonable.” We think that in the absence of the required certificate, the Sheriff is entitled to nothing more than the fees enumerated in the statute, and cannot legally claim the “further compensation” sought to be recovered in this action.

Judgment and order affirmed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geil v. Stevens, 48 Cal. 590, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 209 (Cal. 1874).

48 Cal. 590 (Geil v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Spokane Dry Goods Co.
264 F. 209 (E.D. Washington, 1920)
More v. Western Grain Co.
149 N.W. 564 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
First National Bank of Stevens Point v. Kickbusch
47 N.W. 267 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Shumway v. Leakey
14 P. 841 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Nash v. Muldoon
16 Nev. 404 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1882)
Lane v. McElhany
49 Cal. 421 (California Supreme Court, 1874)