Geigy Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 531
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1957
DocketV. D. 54; Entry No. 966597
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 531 (Geigy Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geigy Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 531 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in Geigy Company, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 379, Abstract 59080. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as follows:

Merchandise United States dollars per each
1, 300 magnifying glasses Art. No. 4, 10 power-$0. 52
1, 300 leather cases to fit_ 0. 19

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geigy Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 379 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geigy-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.