Geigy & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Geigy & Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 170, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 911

United States Customs Court·Decided September 22, 1949·No. No. 53574; protests 148562-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[171]*171Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the product is a color or dye, soluble in water, used for blueing textiles, principally bleached cotton cloth, making it whiter, and that it is obtained, derived, or manufactured, in whole or in part, from toluene, a product provided for in paragraph 1651. The established facts bring the merchandise in question within the provision in paragraph 28 (a), as amended. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[171]*171Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the product is a color or dye, soluble in water, used for blueing textiles, principally bleached cotton cloth, making it whiter, and that it is obtained, derived, or manufactured, in whole or in part, from toluene, a product provided for in paragraph 1651. The established facts bring the merchandise in question within the provision in paragraph 28 (a), as amended. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Geigy & Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 170, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 911 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

23 Cust. Ct. 170 (Geigy & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.