Geiger v. Weiss
This text of 245 A.D. 817 (Geiger v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action torecover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, who was killed in an automobile collision, judgment and order reversed upon the law and a new trial granted as to all defendants, with costs to abide the event. Prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in refusing to permit, in the cross-examination of the defendant Harry Johnson, an inquiry as to whether the said Johnson had been convicted of the crime of driving an automobile while intoxicated. Such proof was competent as affecting the credibility of the witness. This was not a conviction for a traffic infraction, referred to in section 355 of the Civil Practice Act. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geiger-v-weiss-nyappdiv-1935.