Geiger v. Union Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 237 (Geiger v. Union Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for removal to the United States Circuit Court shows that the plaintiff is a resident of the State of New York, and that the defendant is a corporation created under the laws of the State of Maine. That the amount in dispute exceeds $500, and that the petitioner has reason to believe and does believe that from prejudice or local influence it will not be able to obtain justice in this court.
It is not necessary to state in the affidavit the reasons or facts showing the local influence or prejudice ; for these are not traversable matter either in the State or Federal court (Dillon on Removal of Causes, 63). The bond accompanying the petition seems to be in proper form, and the order for removal must be signed, as of course. In order to defeat the application the plaintiff offers to reduce the demand to an amount less than $500. The offer comes too late.
The right to a removal became perfect on filing the petition and bond, and it is not in the power of the plaintiff to defeat it in either court by release or by amendment of the complaint declaring for less than $500 (see Kanouse v. Martin, 15 How. U. S. 198; Wright v. Wells, 1 Pet. C. C. 330; Green v. Custard, [238]*23823 How. U. S. 468 ; Roberts v. Nelson, 8 Blatchf. 74). Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geiger-v-union-mutual-life-insurance-nymarct-1880.