Geiger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Geiger v. State

922 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3496, 2006 WL 617966

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Geiger v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 907 So. 2d 668 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0244·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks belated appeal from an order rendered November 7, 2005, which summarily denied his motion to correct illegal sentence. It has come to light that a notice of appeal, timely filed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(a)(2), was assigned this court’s case number 1D06-0265. The petitioner voluntarily dismissed that appeal based upon a misunderstanding of his remedies. By separate order, case number 1D06-0265 has been sua sponte reinstated by this court. As a consequence, this petition seeking belated appeal is moot and we deny it for that reason.

PETITION SEEKING BELATED APPEAL DENIED AS MOOT.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks belated appeal from an order rendered November 7, 2005, which summarily denied his motion to correct illegal sentence. It has come to light that a notice of appeal, timely filed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(a)(2), was assigned this court’s case number 1D06-0265. The petitioner voluntarily dismissed that appeal based upon a misunderstanding of his remedies. By separate order, case number 1D06-0265 has been sua sponte reinstated by this court. As a consequence, this petition seeking belated appeal is moot and we deny it for that reason.

PETITION SEEKING BELATED APPEAL DENIED AS MOOT.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Geiger v. State, 922 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3496, 2006 WL 617966 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

922 So. 2d 1063 (Geiger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.