Geiger v. Rosenberg

101 N.Y.S. 1122
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 101 N.Y.S. 1122 (Geiger v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geiger v. Rosenberg, 101 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the janitor that prior to the accident he saw the hole into which the plaintiff fell was, under the circumstances, sufficient to warrant a finding of negligence by defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geiger-v-rosenberg-nyappterm-1906.