Geiffert v. Mealey
This text of 267 A.D. 681 (Geiffert v. Mealey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
It is petitioner’s contention that the income in question was received by him in the practice of a profession, viz., that of a landscape architect. The State Tax Commission held that petitioner- is not engaged in the practice of a profession within the meaning of section 386 of the Tax Law. The evidence sustains the. determination. (People ex rel. Tower v. State Tax Commission, 282 N. Y. , 407; Matter of De Vries [Graves], 266 App. Div. 1030, affd. 292 N. Y. 529.)
Determination of the State Tax Commission confirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 681, 48 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geiffert-v-mealey-nyappdiv-1944.