Geier v. Boston & Maine Railroad

219 A.D. 758

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence on the question of contributory negligence. Cochrane, P. J., McCann and Davis, JJ., concur; Van Kirk and Hinman, JJ., concur for reversal, but vote for dismissal, on the ground that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (Raymer v. Rutland R. R. Co., 204 App. Div. 135, and cases cited 137; Cassidy v. Fonda, J. & G. R. R. Co., 200 id. 241; 202 id. 768; affd., 234 N. Y. 599; Spencer v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 123 App. Div. 789; affd., 197 N. Y. 507; Heaney v. L. I. R. R. Co., 112 id. 122, 127; LaGoy v. Director-General of Railroads, 231 id. 191; Neuman v. Union R. Co., 243 id. 249; Allen v. Erie R. R. Co., 244 id. 542.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geier v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 219 A.D. 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

219 A.D. 758 (Geier v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cassidy v. . Fonda, Johnstown and Gloversville Rd. Co.
138 N.E. 462 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Spencer v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
90 N.E. 1157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Spencer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
123 A.D. 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Raymer v. Rutland Railroad
204 A.D. 135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)