Geier v. Alexander
This text of 798 F.2d 469 (Geier v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Rita Sanders GEIER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Dr. Ernest B. Terrell, Plaintiff-Appellant,
United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
Raymond Richardson, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee,
v.
Lamar ALEXANDER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 84-6124.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 12, 1986.
Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, MILBURN, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motions of appellees Richardson and Geier to dismiss this appeal,
And further considering appellant's response,
It is ORDERED that the motions be and they hereby are granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 F.2d 469, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18647, 1986 WL 17160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geier-v-alexander-ca6-1986.