GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS A/A/O BARTHEL ESTENI
This text of GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS A/A/O BARTHEL ESTENI (GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS A/A/O BARTHEL ESTENI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPAEDIC a/a/o BARTHEL ESTENI, Appellee.
No. 4D21-209
[June 30, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mardi Levey Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE19-5404 and COCE16-20784.
Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz-Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
David B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A., No. 4D21- 457 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS A/A/O BARTHEL ESTENI, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geico-indemnity-company-v-hallandale-beach-orthopedics-aao-barthel-fladistctapp-2021.