Geico General Insurance Company v. Patrick N. Yvars

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: October 17, 2025
• Docket: 6D2023-3281
• Status: Published

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-3281 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-003972-O _____________________________

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

PATRICK N. YVARS,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.

October 17, 2025

PER CURIAM.

GEICO General Insurance Company (“Appellant”), the Defendant in the

negligence action below, seeks reversal of a final judgment entered in favor of the

Patrick Yvars (“Yvars”), the Plaintiff and Appellee. Appellant raises two issues—

first, that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding its expert witnesses under

Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); and second, that the trial

court improperly entered a judgment in an amount exceeding the applicable

uninsured motorist insurance policy. We find no error in the trial court’s exclusion of Appellant’s experts under

Binger, and we affirm that exclusion without further discussion. We do, however,

find merit in the second argument. We agree with the rationale applied by our sister

courts in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Finson, 385 So. 3d 196,

197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v.

Hudnall, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D1454, D1454, (Fla. 5th DCA July 3, 2025), both of

which concluded that under Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois, 185 So. 3d

1214 (Fla. 2016), judgments in uninsured motorist cases may not be entered in an

amount exceeding policy limits. Therefore, we reverse the judgment with

instructions that an amended final judgment be entered in Yvars’s favor for the

amount of $20,000.00, which is the policy’s uninsured motorist liability limit. In a

footnote, the judgment shall also reflect the net verdict amount that Yvars could

recover were he to prevail on a bad faith claim against Appellant—$1,367,943.86.

See Finson, 385 So. 3d at 196-97; Hudnall, 50 Fla. L. Weekly at D1454.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Sharon C. Degnan, of Kubicki Draper, Orlando, for Appellant.

Brian J. Lee, of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED