GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. Patricia Mihal
This text of GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. Patricia Mihal (GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. Patricia Mihal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00287-CV
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company, Appellant
v.
Patricia Mihal, Appellee
FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-20-001403, THE HONORABLE CATHERINE MAUZY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal stating that they
have settled the underlying dispute and asking that we issue the mandate early. See Tex. R. App.
P. 18.1(c) (allowing mandate to issue early “if the parties so agree”). We grant the motion and
dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).
__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith
Dismissed
Filed: September 3, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. Patricia Mihal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geico-advantage-insurance-company-v-patricia-mihal-texapp-2021.