Gehrmann v. State
This text of 650 So. 2d 1021 (Gehrmann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Keith GEHRMANN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
No response required for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This Petition for Writ of Certiorari is directed to the circuit court sitting in appellate capacity, which affirmed petitioner's conviction and sentence in the county court for driving under the influence of alcohol. The circuit court held that section 316.1934(5), Florida Statutes (1991) does not violate the confrontation clauses of the federal and Florida constitutions, nor does it impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.
We deny certiorari, as the circuit court applied the correct law in reaching its decision.
GUNTHER, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
650 So. 2d 1021, 1995 WL 15550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gehrmann-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.