Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 337, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1385

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 25, 1962

DocketReap. Dec. 10276; Entry No. 111709

StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 337 (Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 337, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1385 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

OlxveR, Chief Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for reap-praisement has been submitted for decision on stipulation of counsel for the parties, on the basis of which I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a (f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the perfumes involved and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 2.041 per centum, plus the cost of packing at $5 per case.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OlxveR, Chief Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for reap-praisement has been submitted for decision on stipulation of counsel for the parties, on the basis of which I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a (f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the perfumes involved and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 2.041 per centum, plus the cost of packing at $5 per case.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cust. Ct. 337, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gehrig-hoban-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.