Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 750

United States Customs Court·Decided March 21, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9106; Entry No. 890328-1/2·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When tbis appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When tbis appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 750 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

40 Cust. Ct. 750 (Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.