Gehm v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gehm v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

245 A.D. 816

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff, a passenger in a taxicab, was injured in a collision between the taxicab in which she was riding and another car. The taxicab was going in a westerly direction. The other car, coming in an easterly direction, swung to the left in order to pass a truck, and thus came into collision with the taxicab. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff against both defendants. The determination against defendant Yellow Taxi Corporation was against the [817]*817weight of the evidence. Judgment as to defendant Yellow Taxi Corporation reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff, a passenger in a taxicab, was injured in a collision between the taxicab in which she was riding and another car. The taxicab was going in a westerly direction. The other car, coming in an easterly direction, swung to the left in order to pass a truck, and thus came into collision with the taxicab. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff against both defendants. The determination against defendant Yellow Taxi Corporation was against the [817]*817weight of the evidence. Judgment as to defendant Yellow Taxi Corporation reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Gehm v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 245 A.D. 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 816 (Gehm v. Yellow Taxi Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.