Geevarghese v. Shmerler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geevarghese v. Shmerler

71 A.D.3d 1084, 896 N.Y.S.2d 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 1084 (Geevarghese v. Shmerler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geevarghese v. Shmerler, 71 A.D.3d 1084, 896 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover [1085]*1085damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered April 8, 2009, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The present action arises from a motor vehicle accident. After joinder of issue, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In support of his motion, the plaintiff established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Covello, J.P., Miller, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover [1085]*1085damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered April 8, 2009, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The present action arises from a motor vehicle accident. After joinder of issue, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In support of his motion, the plaintiff established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Covello, J.P., Miller, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 1084, 896 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geevarghese-v-shmerler-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack